Mossberg's mailbox, September 15
Walter S. Mossberg, The Wall Street Journal
Published September 15, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
I am in the market for a new HDTV, and the newspaper ads are using terminology that I'm unfamiliar with. Do TVs rated at "720p" provide the same quality picture as those rated at "1080p"?
Technically, the answer is no, but it may not matter. The 1080p resolution is certainly higher, but almost nobody can tell the difference between the same material shown in the two resolutions on TV screens up to around 50 inches in size and at the typical distances from which people watch those screens. Not only that, but most sources of video content, with the exception of Blu-ray discs, can't even fully utilize 1080p. Major TV networks don't use it yet because it requires a lot of bandwidth.
If you can afford a set that can handle 1080p, you might want to buy it so that you are ready in case a lot of 1080p content one day becomes available. You might also want a 1080p set if you are a videophile; have an enormous screen or a projector that fills a large wall; or if you play a lot of Blu-ray discs and believe you can discern the difference on a typical-sized screen. Otherwise, you could save money by buying a 720p set and you might never know the difference.
In 2006, you recommended a powerline adapter for Internet access by Netgear, the XE104. Is this still a good buy or are there others by now that are better?
I haven't tested powerline adapters, the gadgets that route computer networks over standard home electrical wiring, since that date. Netgear and its competitors - such as Linksys and Belkin - have, naturally, come out with newer, faster units since then. But I am still personally using the XE104 successfully and feel I continue to get my money's worth from it. It is still being sold.
The newer units typically have greater speed in order to do a better job of streaming video around a home, but they work in basically the same way.
I have a Windows XP system, and things work well with my cable modem in my office. But when I'm on the road using Wi-Fi, I can receive e-mails, but can't reply or send. Any idea on how to resolve this problem?
This usually happens because the Wi-Fi provider is blocking the outgoing e-mail server (called an "SMTP" server) that you or your IT department has set up in your e-mail program. Some providers block all such outgoing servers. There are a number of possible solutions. The simplest is to use a Web-based e-mail service, like Gmail or Yahoo Mail, or the Web-based version of your usual service. If your e-mail is provided by your company, you may be able to access a version of Microsoft Outlook over the Internet that will work.
Another possibility is to ask the provider at the hotel or airport what SMTP server it does allow - usually its own - and enter it into your e-mail program's settings, if you know how. Yet another option would be to use a data card from a cell-phone carrier, which I have found can usually overcome this problem.
There may be other workarounds, and I invite readers to suggest them.
Walter S. Mossberg writes for The Wall Street Journal.
Featured
-
DNC in Denver
Complete coverage of the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
-
The Crevasse
A five-part series that examines one tragic day on Mount Rainier.
-
Deadly denial
Sick nuclear workers applied for government compensation but most haven't seen a dime.
-
Final Salute
The Rocky followed Maj. Steve Beck as he took on the most difficult duty of his career.
-
'Colorado's burning'
Coverage of the state's worst wildfires.
-
Columbine shootings
Coverage of the April 20, 1999, shootings at Littleton's Columbine High School.
-
The Crossing
Colorado's deadliest traffic accident killed 20 children on Dec. 14, 1961.
-
Osveli's journey
Osveli Sales left Guatemala for a better life. Two months later, he came home in a box.
-
Wake for an Indian warrior
Oglala Sioux bestow a tribute to the first tribal fatality in Iraq.

