State delegation divided over bill
4 vote no, saying more changes still were needed
Berny Morsonand M.E. Sprengelmeyer, Rocky Mountain News
Published October 4, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
Four Colorado lawmakers who initially opposed the bailout bill stuck to their position Friday in the U.S. House.
Opposing the bill were U.S. Reps. Doug Lamborn, R-Colorado Springs, Marilyn Musgrave, R-Fort Morgan, John Salazar, D-Manassa, and Mark Udall, D-Eldorado Springs. All had voted against the measure on Monday.
Supporting the bill, as they had in the previous vote, were U.S. Reps. Diana DeGette, D-Denver, Ed Perlmutter, D-Golden, and Tom Tancredo, R-Littleton.
Proponents had warned that the economy could spiral into depression unless action were taken immediately.
But Udall said he was disappointed that after the initial rejection of the bill, the U.S. Senate added hundreds of pages of so-called "sweeteners" to win votes but did not add some of the provisions he was seeking to protect taxpayers and homeowners in jeopardy from the mortgage foreclosure crisis.
Udall praised one new addition in the bill that will raise the amount of bank deposits that are guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., from $100,000 to $250,000.
"Those extra 300 pages don't do anything to fix the broken financial system that got us to this place in the first place," said Udall, who's running for Senate against Republican former Congressman Bob Schaffer.
Salazar also objected to the additional spending added to the bill, calling it "irresponsible."
"I voted against this on principle," Salazar said.
Salazar said he proposed doling out the bailout funds in increments of $50 billion a month, instead of giving the Treasury secretary $700 billion in one payment. That method would have given Congress time to work on the larger issues, he said.
But that proposal was turned down, Salazar said.
Musgrave also was holding out for deeper reforms.
"We should have gotten to fundamental reform before we passed that bill. I feel like this is happening backwards," she said.
Musgrave said the bill was "larded up" with additional spending.
"The American people are sick to death of earmarks," she said.
In a statement following the vote Friday, Lamborn called the bill "fundamentally flawed."
"It relies too much on taxpayer dollars to bail out reckless investors and not enough on private sector dollars."
Lamborn wanted a bill "that would have injected liquidity into our markets through tax incentives, releasing the economic power inherent in the American economy."
Featured
-
DNC in Denver
Complete coverage of the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
-
The Crevasse
A five-part series that examines one tragic day on Mount Rainier.
-
Deadly denial
Sick nuclear workers applied for government compensation but most haven't seen a dime.
-
Final Salute
The Rocky followed Maj. Steve Beck as he took on the most difficult duty of his career.
-
'Colorado's burning'
Coverage of the state's worst wildfires.
-
Columbine shootings
Coverage of the April 20, 1999, shootings at Littleton's Columbine High School.
-
The Crossing
Colorado's deadliest traffic accident killed 20 children on Dec. 14, 1961.
-
Osveli's journey
Osveli Sales left Guatemala for a better life. Two months later, he came home in a box.
-
Wake for an Indian warrior
Oglala Sioux bestow a tribute to the first tribal fatality in Iraq.
October 5, 2008
12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Shadow writes:
The so called experts are now crying for bailouts for Massachuettes, and officially 7 billion for California. When will this bailout end? For tose who voted for it shame on them. Credit to Mark Udall for finally doing something in a responsible measure for the electorit. As for Tancredo, he is leaving office. No more support will I ever show this RINO sell out to his constituents.