Romer backs Obama
Rocky Mountain News
Originally published 09:10 a.m., May 13, 2008
Updated 12:55 p.m., May 13, 2008
When do you think the Democrats' superdelegates should commit to a candidate?
Photo by Rocky Mountain News
Roy Romer and wife, Bea
Roy Romer, a former Colorado governor and Democratic National Committee chairman, threw his support behind Sen. Barack Obama today as the presidential candidate who can win Western states and ultimately the White House in November.
"I think Senator Obama offers a very strong leadership based on hope and change that's struck a deep chord in the American hearts and minds," Romer, a key superdelegate, said in a teleconference arranged by the Obama campaign.
"I think the West is ripe for his candidacy," Romer added, noting that the Illinois senator beat Sen. Hillary Clinton in the Colorado caucuses by 67-to-32 percent.
Romer, a longtime Clinton ally and former co-chair of President Bill Clinton's 1996 reelection campaign, stressed that he wasn't trying to force Hillary Clinton out of the marathon primary battle.
"This has been a very vigorous primary and Sen. Clinton has been a very strong and formidable candidate," Romer said, describing her as a personal friend who will continue to be a vital leader and asset for the Democratic Party.
"But the math is controlling," Romer said. "This race, I believe, is over. Sen. Obama has accumulated a lead in delegates chosen in primaries, caucuses and superdelegates that cannot be overcome."
Romer said he chose to make his decision known before Saturday's state Democratic Party convention to prod cohorts as they pick delegates to the national convention in Denver this August.
"A lot of people in the party are ready to close down the primary and get on with the general election," Romer said, adding that he believes "it is the time for the party to unify" behind Obama for the coming battle against Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee.
"For those of us who are superdelegates, it's important for her to know where we are so that she is not mislead," Romer said of Clinton. "I think all superdelegates would help the party by making (their votes) known as quickly as they can.
"That's not forcing anybody out of the race. That's simply giving them facts that they can then base their own campaign decisions on," he added.
Superdelegates are the Democratic elected officials and party leaders who are free to support whichever candidate they feel has the best chance of winning in November.
Obama campaign manager David Plouffe stressed the West's crucial role in the candidate's general election strategy.
"We think Barack Obama has shown a real strength in the Western part of the country and that's going to be integral to us winning the presidency in November," Plouffe said.
"We believe Colorado, a state Governor Romer knows as well as anybody, is going to be, not just a battle ground state, but a state we believe we can win and put in the Obama column in November," he said.
"I think particularly in Western states, Senator Obama is going to provide a terrific electoral climate for Democratic candidates up and down the ballot," he added.
Post your comment
Registration is required. Click here to create your free user account, or login below.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
May 13, 2008
9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
T1anda writes:
Who cares?? Maybe Romers wife does! You know the one he cheated on for years while he was Gov of Colorado! LOL!!!!
May 13, 2008
9:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
farsidefan writes:
Just as B. Owens did for years. The great family values man. He valued family so much, he has two. LOL'er. But who cares ? Right..
May 13, 2008
10:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
airbornebigfoot writes:
who cares sums it up for most of us.
isnt Romer the same guy who dropped the 'O' from
his last name so it wouldnt sound Hispanic?
(Romero).
Of course, look at all the good he did for the L.A. Unified School District.......LOL!
May 13, 2008
10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Big_D writes:
I just hope Obama runs with Richardson. They could sweep the south with that ticket because Richardson is NRA endorsed. A large majority of the GOP loyal vote on just gun control, they hate everything about the “new” GOP but that.
May 13, 2008
10:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
T1anda writes:
Farsidefan, has B. Owens endorsed Obama also?? If he has I hadn't heard. Owens was just as bad as Romer-o!! LOL!!
May 13, 2008
10:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Big_D writes:
BO would leave us with change instead of a 7K deficit for every man woman and child like Bush has. Maybe after he reduces Bush's debt we will have less taxes but the Bush debt is so HUGE I doubt our deficit will be wiped for at least eight years. That's only if we have a candidate that is smart enough to get out of the 300 billion a month we are throwing down a rat hole in Iraq.
May 13, 2008
10:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
mlbdenver writes:
It is not made clear in the article, but Romer is a superdelegate. THAT is why we should care.
May 13, 2008
10:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
DenverDan writes:
Correct choice. Good JOB Romer.......
May 13, 2008
11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Spencer writes:
Big D, I think that Sasq could probably care less about the debt. Ill health and won't be around much longer.
May 13, 2008
11:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
HumanBeans writes:
Just say no to Obama and his typical white Grandmama!
May 13, 2008
11:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Earl writes:
and remember these are the every vote should count dumpocraps who could care less about florida or michigan voters, until november. the party of hope for change as they are the same now as they were in the 40's.
and some body please give little spency a lollipop so he will fell like he has been to a free socialist health clinic. everyone knows he cant take care of himself and needs bo to do it for him.
May 13, 2008
12:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
Charles_B writes:
Earl:
Sometimes typing your stream of conscious imbecilisms into the permanent record isn't the best course of action.
If I were instructing you in composition I'd recommend you edit, edit, edit--then just delete the whole thing.
May 13, 2008
12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Earl writes:
but you dont charLenE and if you did I wouldnt listen as it makes me happy your shorts get up in a twist all the time. so why wont YOUR progressive liberals stand up and fight for florida and michigan voters to have their votes counted? it is because they didnt follow in lock step with howard dean and his ilk?
why are you not screaming about not every vote counting and its within your own party?
yep chaos is the best way to put the shape your party is in.
May 13, 2008
12:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Big_D writes:
Earl,
I know your party doesn't think rules or laws are important and you can stay with your own party.
May 13, 2008
12:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Charles_B writes:
Earl:
I thought you were a big-bad "law and order" conservative. Now all the sudden you support changing the rules mid-stream?
You're a transparent "concern troll".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet...
Please refer back to the advice I posted above your last nonsensical diatribe.
May 13, 2008
12:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
jay writes:
concern troll...love it
May 13, 2008
12:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
jay writes:
concern troll...love it
May 13, 2008
12:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
DenverDan writes:
Why is it only weird white men listen to A.M. radio?
May 13, 2008
1:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Marshdale writes:
Once again Sasquatch is fooled by right wing rhetoric. Gobble gobble. Swallow the whole pill.
May 13, 2008
2:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
LingLingfor_prez writes:
This would be great, if I was a lemming. Who cares!!!
May 13, 2008
3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
HSTOWEL writes:
Yea for sure I'm jumping on the Obama bandwagon. NOT! Let me see, regarding just the good Reverend Wright and his association here are the possibilities I see:
1) He didn't hear or know about any of these sermons or his pastor's racist point of views. If this is really true then he is far too naive to be President however the evidence indicates that his initial statements regarding this were lies.
2) He heard about the statements and was aware of some of his views but could not discard his crazy uncle anymore than he could discard his "white grandmother" (who is also typical). Most likely he wanted to be at this church for political reasons however if he sat there for twenty years listening to this for political gain then he is immoral and lacks the courage to do the right thing. Once again we don't need him as President.
3) He not only heard the sermons and was fully aware of his pastor's point of view but he fully endorsed them. If this were true once again we don't need him as President.
I suspect it's a combination of both #2 and #3 with more weight on #2. He has other associations that are also suspect including his wife. There are many people who would like to see a minority elected to the Presidency but surely not this guy. He's a fraud and it's going to continue to spill out until November.
May 13, 2008
4:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
DenverDan writes:
HSTOWEL Did you vote for bush twice? Do you even go to church?
does eveything your pastor stands for, you do too. Stay away from fox news. You dont want to know what my pastor said about gas prices. Pins on coats, pastors inc, have what to do with being a president? You people on the right dont talk about the real issues because then that would mean Bush would be brought up. So stick to the real things that matter like pins on a coat..
May 13, 2008
4:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
farsidefan writes:
HS, let's see...McCain's minister is Hagee right ? Hagee of the trashing of the Catholic faith. Oh wait, he apologized. I guess he didn't mean any of those things. Of course, this was after meeting with 22 religious zealots in D.C. who straightened him out. Didn't want to disenfranchise the Catholic voting block.
Both ministers spew hate. How Christian huh ?
May 13, 2008
4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
Big_D writes:
McCain just stated that clean energy is not only vital for our environment it is also key to our national security. Time for you right wing nuts to go jump in a lake. McCain believes in global warming so now you have no candidates left or far right as the case may be. Maybe you can have Rush run as a libertarian.
May 13, 2008
4:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
DenverDan writes:
SAY no to "old" BUSH 3. Go Obama.
May 13, 2008
7:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
nonayerbsns writes:
Romer is a schmuck. We need not listen to these people saying that the 'delegates' have spoken. They haven't. Furthermore, the delegates should be dismissed.
May 14, 2008
7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Charles_B writes:
HSTOWEL:
As much as reactionary hacks on the right would like it to matter, Reverend Wright *doesn't matter* to the voting public.
The only drag on either ticket of any significance is the drag Bush will have on *all* Republicans this November.
The fact that the 60-seat threshold is in reach in the Senate is nothing short of amazing. Only the categorical incompetence of the Republican Govern-by-Crony program could have chummed the electoral waters so nicely for Democrats.