Go to the mobile version of this Web site.

Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Paid archives | Alerts | Electronic edition | Subscribe to the paper
Subscribe

Colorado election clerks plan only partial use of new system

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Story Tools

Clerks in several large counties are so nervous about the new $13 million statewide voter registration program that they plan to use their old systems for most Election Day functions this year.

During simulated elections that ended Friday, clerks had problems accessing the system from polling sites and generating data reports. They also said the system, known as SCORE (State of Colorado Registration and Election) slowed down when many poll workers were connected simultaneously.

That's why clerks in Weld, Mesa and Larimer counties plan to use their county systems to check in voters on Election Day. Other clerks also want to limit the use of the new system this year.

SCORE "has great potential, and in a few years it's going to be one slick system," said Sheila Reiner, elections director for Mesa County, which uses electronic voting machines at vote centers. "But right now it's still under development."

Paper poll book in Denver

SCORE, which is more than two years late because of problems with the first contractor, was developed to comply with federal law that requires all states to have a uniform voter registration database.

SCORE's Colorado database is complete, and counties must use it in this election.

But some clerks plan to load the database into their own county systems - systems with which they're comfortable.

Other functions of SCORE are not finished, which worries election officials preparing for a primary just three months away.

Colorado is one of the last states to implement its voter database and one of the only states to use it for the first time during the presidential election. The cost has recently risen from $11 million to $13 million because more workers were needed to help counties use the system this year.

The secretary of state's office said it expected problems to surface during the mock election.

"The mock election didn't produce any surprises but did meet its objectives by identifying gaps in the system," said spokesman Richard Coolidge. "We currently are working with county clerks and recorders across the state to compile the issues identified in the mock election."

Counties that conduct elections using vote centers need to connect to SCORE or their county systems throughout Election Day to check in voters, make sure they haven't voted already and give them credit for casting ballots.

Many other counties will use paper poll books with names of voters and won't need to use SCORE extensively on Election Day.

Denver County saw huge lines in November 2006 because its new electronic poll book crashed. An estimated 20,000 voters left polling places without voting because of the delays.

Michael Scarpello, Denver elections director, said he will use paper poll books for the Aug. 12 primary and Nov. 4 general election.

He said his workers experienced minor problems with SCORE during the mock election.

"We think that the system is very robust. It does a lot of things, and it appears that eventually it's going to do a lot of things very well," Scarpello said. "Right now we're just ironing out a few wrinkles."

Slowness a concern

Adams County Clerk Karen Long isn't as enthusiastic.

"The jury is still out," she said.

Long, who uses electronic voting machines at vote centers, said poll workers couldn't get on SCORE to begin their elections during the Election Day simulation last week. It took more than an hour, with calls to the help desk, to fix the problem.

Weld County is worried about slowness in the system. The county had 40 election workers - about a third of the number expected to be working on Election Day - accessing SCORE simultaneously last week. Their computer screens went blank for up to 30 seconds before bringing up information screens.

Weld County is planning to use its county registration system to conduct most parts of the election this year.

"We're not trying to bash the system," said Weld County Clerk Steve Moreno. "This is going to be a great system - eventually."

Douglas County Clerk Jack Arrowsmith is worried SCORE isn't currently designed to generate an electronic poll book for combined precincts, the type of polling place he plans to use this year. Arrowsmith wants to use an electronic poll book to check in voters. If SCORE can't do that, he said, he plans to use his county system.

kimm@RockyMountainNews.com or 303-954-2361

What's the SCORE?

Election officials across Colorado are preparing for expected record turnouts in the Aug. 12 primary and Nov. 4 general elections. They will begin using a new voter registration system and database called SCORE.

* What is SCORE?

SCORE (State of Colorado Registration and Election) is the new statewide voter registration database being designed by Saber Corp. of Oregon.

* What does it do?

It maintains a computerized list of all eligible voters in Colorado and cross-checks voter information with other agencies to make sure names of felons or dead people aren't on the rolls. It also helps officials plan and administer elections, such as generating reports on which races a voter may cast ballots in and which workers are assigned to a particular site. It does not count votes.

* Why is SCORE necessary?

A 2002 federal law requires all states to have uniform voter registration lists.

* Can the public access SCORE?

No. The system contains strict security protections and only election workers are permitted to use it.

* How will SCORE affect me on Election Day?

It depends on what kind of voting system your county uses. Many counties, like Denver, will use paper poll books, and not SCORE, to process voters on Election Day. But other counties, like Adams, Weld and Larimer, will use computers to check in voters - and therefore will use either SCORE or their county systems. So the speed of the computer system will affect lines. If the database works slowly or crashes, lines will be long. That's what happened in Denver in 2006.

* How can I check my voter registration status?

You can contact your county clerk's office or go to "Elections Home" on the secretary of state's Web site: sos.state.co.us.

Comments

Posted by LoFat on May 7, 2008 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Here we have another law designed to eliminate voter fraud and three counties are not going to use it this election. Once again the dead, illegals, and registered Democrats will be allowed to vote multiple times for the candidate of their choice.

Reference the Juan Trujillo-Mike Salas matchup in the nineties. Juan Trujillo, the Democrat, was found to have won the election by a narrow margin of less than 150 votes. It was later determined that five rows of the Catholic cemetery in Trinidad had faithfully voted that year. Upon review, well over 500 votes were disallowed as either multiple ballots by mentally weak nursing home patients or the dead in the cemetery. All were absentee ballots in the Democratic Candidates favor. The notaries that verified these false absentee ballots all lost their notary license, two of them permanently. The two ringleaders were women placed fairly high in the Las Animas County Democratic Party. This is as was reported in the Denver Post after the investigation. This is my source of information.

To Mr. Trujillo's credit, I believe the investigation cleared him of any knowledge or complicity whatsoever of the voter fraud. I would not presume him to have had any part in this fraud.

Posted by beentheredonethat on May 7, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Look up the book and movie called Black Box Voting. It's scarier than dead people's votes. It delved into the fact that one precinct in Florida's 2000 election managed to certify over 18,000 NEGATIVE votes, and then one CITIZEN'S (not government, of course) investigation proved that the electronic voting systems are not secure and can be rigged through programs in the reader cards to lop the vote. Funny-- no mention of this in the local news, as far as I can tell-- but maybe it was there and I missed it???

Posted by LoFat on May 7, 2008 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This is called "conspiracy theory" or "urban ledgend beliefs". People also believe that the Supreme Court handed the election to Bush. The Supreme Court in fact ruled 7 to 2 that Al Gore's selective recount was unconstitutional. The Court then split 5 to 4 on remedy. The four Justices in the minority wanted a total recount. There was not enough time for a full recount before the electoral college met so the Florida tally was allowed to stand as certified.

Yet the Democrats refused to believe that Bush actually won. Had Gore requested an entire state recount, the election might have turned out differently. Instead he chose to illegally cherry pick precints to recount in an attempt to steal the election.

Have a nice day, beentheredonethat

Post your comment (Requires free registration.)

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.




(Forgotten your password?)




News Tip

Know about something we should be reporting? Tell us about it.


Reprints