Severance tax battle heats up
Foes of hike tied to civil rights group backed by industry
Todd Hartman and Gargi Chakrabarty
Thursday, May 1, 2008
- Email this
- Print this
- Comments
- Change text size

- Subscribe to print edition
- iPod friendly
Claims that a proposal to raise more state revenues from oil and gas drilling would hurt poor families are coming from a group tied to a conservative black civil rights organization that has received energy industry money.
Colorado Consumers for Affordable Energy was launched by Rob Fairbank, a former Republican lawmaker from Littleton, with help from the Congress of Racial Equality, a national group that disputes global warming and has received $275,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998, records and news reports show.
Colorado Consumers chairman Bishop Phillip Porter, of the All Nations Pentecostal Church of God in Christ in Aurora, issued a letter Wednesday headlined "Stop The Ritter Gas Tax."
The letter argues that a ballot initiative that Gov. Bill Ritter wants to go to voters in November would lead to higher gasoline and natural gas prices.
"Apparently, they don't think we pay enough for our gasoline and home heating bills now," the letter said. "They think we can and should pay a little more. Maybe a lot more."
Dan Hopkins, spokesman for former Gov. Bill Owens, will act as the industry campaign's voice to defeat the ballot initiative, said a spokeswoman for the Colorado Oil & Gas Association. Veteran political consultant Rick Reiter, who led the campaign to pass Referendum C, also has signed on.
The ballot initiative would do away with a state credit that saves oil and gas companies about $200 million a year in severance taxes that would otherwise go into state coffers. The money generated by the change would help communities affected by the state's energy boom, pay for college scholarships, and aid water and wildlife projects.
Letter called misleading
Ritter spokesman Evan Dreyer called Porter's letter "extremely misleading" and said "not one drop of the natural gas produced in Colorado ends up in anyone's gas tank."
Dreyer said the proposal would do away with a "decades-old special tax credit that has long outlived its usefulness."
"No other state provides the oil and gas industry a credit of this magnitude," Dreyer said.
The Porter letter amounts to the first blast in a rugged campaign, with insiders predicting the oil and gas industry could shell out $15 million to $20 million to defeat the initiative.
Energy companies succeeded in a similar campaign to kill a severance tax hike in California in 2006, spending about $90 million compared with $60 million spent by the measure's backers.
The Colorado Consumers group launched radio commercials earlier this spring attacking ongoing efforts to toughen environmental rules being developed by state regulators responding to concerns about the energy industry's impacts on public health, land and wildlife.
"It's a consumer group that focuses its message primarily on the impacts of rules and regulations and initiatives and laws, and the impacts of those on the retail cost of energy," said Fairbank, who launched the group and traveled to New York to seek support from the Congress of Racial Equality. CORE leaders, in turn, connected Fairbank with Porter.
Group mum on donors
Porter has been associated with conservative causes locally, including backing a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman, passed by voters in 2006.
He is also a former chairman of the board of the Promise Keepers, a national Christian men's group based in Denver, and spoke out in favor of conservative Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito.
Fairbank and Porter said that the Colorado Consumers organization isn't required to reveal its donors.
CORE's spokesman Niger Innis said that his group has provided no financial support to Colorado Consumers but has worked with Bishop Porter on social issues over the past year.
The group's assertion that raising more tax revenues from gas and oil drilling would push up energy prices for consumers was questioned, given the complex nature of fuel markets.
"There is no linear relation between taxes paid by oil and gas companies and prices of natural gas," said Lakshman D. Guruswamy, director of the University of Colorado's Center for Energy & Environmental Security. "Also, the introduction of a tax does not mean higher prices for consumers, because producers have to take into account what consumers would tolerate."



Comments
Posted by glowrock on May 1, 2008 at 6:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This could possibly go down as the most ridiculous story in Colorado's history. Somehow, eliminating some huge tax breaks to oil and gas companies is going to harm the poor? Even coming close to equalizing the severance tax rate in this state when compared with adjoining states is going to hurt the poor?
My god, what a load of tripe!
Posted by Logical on May 1, 2008 at 8:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
glowrock,
How it will hurt the poor is by raising fuel rates, which raises our heating and electric bills.
We heat most of our homes with natural gas. Raise the cost of extracting the natural gas from the ground, and you raise the cost of natural gas to Exel Energy, who passes that cost to us.
Electricity is also generated with natural gas at some of Exel's plants, so the increased cost of that gas gets passed to us in our electric bills.
That is how it will impact the poor, the middle-class, and the rich, not to mention businesses. Then, businesses raise their prices, which further impacts us.
Clear enough, now? Heat your home with "tripe", and you will be okay. But, cost increase is reality, not tripe.
Posted by raysmom on May 1, 2008 at 9:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Logical- You said it! Big corporations don't pay taxes- people do. It will also reduce the # of private sector jobs, from the O & G industry to small businesses w/higher overhead. And now that Ritter & Co have stalled production on the Roan, costing millions, this is really putting salt on the wound. And the $$$ that would be going into the State's till is earmarked for special interests, and won't stimulate anything but the trough, and that never created a job.
Posted by bjones73 on May 1, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We're missing another point here. And that is Xcel's increasing reliance on natural gas.
Not only to heat our homes, but to power their plants!
Their decision to shut down to coal plants in favor of switching them to natural gas is only going to increase our reliance on a fuel that is in short supply and comes with extremely volatile price fluctuations.
We have a 200 year supply of coal right here in the US. It's lunacy not to use it.
When the price of natural gas goes up, so do our heating bills AND if Xcel gets it way, more so in our electricity bills because they'll rely on gas to power their electricity plants!
It's foolish to disregard the fact that we need all resources - coal, gas and renewables to meet demand.
The fact that Xcel is placing all its eggs in the natural gas basket is crazy!!!
You think gasoline is high - natural gas will soon be in the same league and Xcel wants to use it like it's an ocean!
Posted by Logical on May 1, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Exel doesn't "want" to use natural gas, they are being forced to by the enviro-whackos (the same folks who want to curtail drilling). Coal is "dirty", so we can't use as much of it. Ignore the massive improvements in emission output from coal plants, since the left ignores the facts, in favor of what makes them feel good.
There are costs associated with progress, but the left doesn't want to acknowledge those costs/tradeoffs. But, they will be some of the first to call for more regulation on utility prices when their bills go up due to more taxes on extraction.
Posted by socrates on May 1, 2008 at 4:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Gas is going up whether or not this passes - not because of taxes, because of markets. The same markets that wyoming gas is going to - where their severance tax is three times what ours is.
The impact to low income is a silly argument, but one that will no doubt be hammered to death by these guys. Fairbank is well known as someone who doesn't let integrity, truth or plain common sense get in the way of a good political mud fight. These guys would say anything, and probably will.
Post your comment (Requires free registration.)
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.