Legislature squandered millions by rejecting film industry aid
This Web only Speakout has not been edited.
Denise Strong
Thursday, March 27, 2008
- Email this
- Print this
- Comments
- Change text size

- Subscribe to print edition
- iPod friendly
The voters of Colorado need to know that the State of Colorado is losing billions of dollars in business to other states because the House finance committee voted 6-5 and rejected the film incentive bill, HB 1355, on Tuesday March 18th. Due to the recent low value of the dollar, the worldwide film business is returning to the USA for a majority of movie production and the State of Colorado is missing out on this revenue as we watch neighboring New Mexico attract over 1.5 billion film business dollars since 2005.
It is important to understand that film production works differently than most businesses. It is literally on wheels as shooting companies move and shoot for several months and then they are gone, leaving little or no impact other than the millions of dollars spent on goods and services in the local economy. Another difference is that producers choose where to shoot based on a particular state’s film incentive legislation and how it compares with the other 40 States who offer attractive plans to bring the production dollars to their state.
Colorado has one of the weakest film incentive plans in the nation and now it seems it will be without a state funded Film Commission office, giving Colorado even more of a disadvantage as we compete for these much needed dollars. The states with the most aggressive film incentives are New Mexico & Louisiana and they are enjoying huge revenues from a variety of film production while Colorado is not even being considered for this business.
The 25% transferable tax credit proposal would be self-funded as no monies are credited until it is proven that the film production dollars have already been spent in Colorado. It is estimated that as this currency moves from employee or merchant throughout the local economy that the initial sum spent is multiplied 4-5 times. Unfortunately, six members of the state house finance committee could not understand the magnitude of spending a quarter million dollars a day and what an overwhelming boost that can have throughout a local economy. They seemed stuck in the small-minded thinking that the state will only get about 7% tax revenue on the qualifying budget, while the tax credit is 25%. The point is, without a strong incentive package Colorado will get none of this lucrative business because it will continue going where it is most attractive. Not to mention the positive economic effect on tourism if a movie featuring Colorado is wildly successful, as was seen recently in Wyoming tourism after Brokeback Mountain was released.
Do these politicians care that the voters do not want to lose this business to other states? Do they comprehend that the taxpayers support this economic development strategy, as the public understands the multiplying effect of an economic surge? If you don’t want Colorado to lose this immense economic opportunity let these short sighted politicians know that you do not support their decision to vote NO on the self funded tax credit proposed in House Bill 1355.
Joel Judd- D 303.866.2925
Debbie Benefield - D 303.866.2950
Doug Bruce -R 303.866.5525
Jeanne Labuda-D 303.866.2966
Kent Lambert- R 303.866.2937
Kevin Lundberg-R 303.866.2907—————
The Yes votes were granted by
Alice Borodkin- D
Mark Ferrandino- D
Jerry Frangas - D
Jim Kerr - D
John Kefalas - D
Denise Strong is a resident of Arvada.



Comments
Posted by mytwosense on March 27, 2008 at 2:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
These are all valid benefits. However, film production also shuts down huge areas at any given time, creating many headaches and hassles for ordinary citizens, who, for months at a time, can't access places they previous could.
Colorado, unlike many other states, isn't all-consumed with "economic strategy" and continuous growth. We kind of want to hold onto many of the best aspects of this state.
Posted by yaakovwatkins on March 27, 2008 at 5:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You are proposing a 25% tax credit? 25% of what? Total expenditures in Colorado or state sales tax?
If the answer is 25% of total spent in Colorado, then the writer needs to learn cost accounting because the idea is stupid. That is more than the net profit margin of all the businesses involved.
If the answer is 25% of state sales tax, then where does 7% come in? State sales tax is 2.9%. 25% of 2.9% is almost 3/4 of one percent. Film producers are not going to choose between two locations on the basis of 3/4 of one percent expected costs.
Posted by mrfxx on March 28, 2008 at 4:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Once again what we are seeing is "Individual welfare bad, corporate welfare good" in action. The problem is that EVERY state has to come to the conclusion that the film industry which can pay a single worker (actor) in the millions for a single movie can afford to pay their tax burden in EVERY state where they film - or the film industry will continue to pit states against each other.
Posted by Elwood on March 28, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I bet if the movie company's name was shell or exxon, the position would be the complete opposite.
Post your comment (Requires free registration.)
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.