Mining companies agree to $20.5 million settlement
By Todd Hartman, Rocky Mountain News (Contact)
Published July 1, 2008 at 6:10 p.m.
Updated July 1, 2008 at 6:10 p.m.
Two mining giants have agreed to pay Colorado $20.5 million to compensate for a legacy of polluted streams, fish kills and contaminated groundwater from decades of hard rock mining around Leadville.
Under terms of a consent decree to be filed in U.S. District Court, ASARCO will pay $10 million and Resurrection/Newmont USA Ltd. will pay $10.5 million in "natural resource damages" to make up for the environmental harm in the mining district.
The damages are associated with the California Gulch Superfund site, an 18-square mile region that includes Leadville and headwaters of the Arkansas River. The region has been mined for gold, silver, lead, zinc and copper since 1859.
The legal settlement for environmental damages is Colorado's second largest ever, trailing only the $35 millon the Army and Shell Oil Co. agreed to pay Colorado for environmental damages at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Adams County, northeast of Denver.
The California Gulch agreement is distinct from a long-running Superfund cleanup of the site, dating to 1983, that has seen the federal government and private companies spend tens of millions of dollars to divert pollutants from the Arkansas River, among other projects.
"Today marks the close of an important chapter in our fight to protect and restore Colorado's environment," said Attorney General John Suthers. "I am very pleased that we have been able to recover more than $55 million in the past few weeks to ensure that our state's greatest resource is maintained."
Under federal environmental cleanup laws, polluters can be sued for natural resource damages as well as cleanup costs.
In this case, the money will likely be used to improve fish habitat along an 11-mile stretch of the Arkansas River, purchase open space as well as finish cleanup of the Black Cloud Mine. Work on the projects is expected to begin next summer.
Jeff Deckler, a top Superfund cleanup official at the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, said some of the money could be spent on projects just outside of the Superfund site but still affected by mining.
"You don't want to spend natural resource damage money on stuff that should have been part of the cleanup," Deckler said.
California Gulch includes more than 2,000 slag piles, tailings piles, waste rock piles, and abandoned mine structures, as well as the Yak Drainage Tunnel, which has been the source of 70 to 80 percent of the contamination in the upper Arkansas River basin, Deckler said.
Aside from cleanup money already spent — which the private companies are not obligated to reveal — and the $20.5 million natural resource damage settlement, Resurrection/Newmont will spend an estimated $118 million operating a water treatment at the Yak Tunnel in perpetuity.
Post your comment
Registration is required. Click here to create your free user account, or login below.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Featured
-
Rocky Multimedia
The news comes alive in our videos and slide shows. Catch up on what's happening today.
-
Holiday Lights
Is your house the jolliest on the block? Submit your holiday lights display.
-
Holiday Gift Guide
Looking to get a jump-start on the holiday shopping season?
-
Mount Crushmore
Which four Broncos greats should be immortalized on Mount Crushmore? Vote here.
-
Bronco Dean's rant
Listen to Bronco Dean's midweek rant on the Chiefs.
-
Broncos Video
Get the latest from Dove Valley as the Broncos prepare for Sunday's matchup.
-
Calendar wallpaper
Download this month's desktop wallpaper calendar
-
Sam Adams' Open Mic
Open Mic: Stirrin' the Soup with Matt Iseman
-
The Rocky @ 150 Years
Read the Rocky's coverage of Colorado's cannibal, Alfred Packer, in 1886.




July 1, 2008
8:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
maithoughts writes:
If this was a superfund site the feds have spent money on it. How much? You reporters are hacks. You do not even do research before you put out this dribble.