House kicks up an investigation

GOP condemns Bruce for encounter with Rocky photographer

By Chris Barge, Rocky Mountain News (Contact)

Originally published 12:30 a.m., January 15, 2008
Updated 06:57 p.m., January 15, 2008

Photo by Linda McConnell@Special to the Rocky

State Rep. Douglas Bruce re-enacts what he characterizes as a "more of a nudge or a tap," one day after kicking a Rocky photographer in the knee in the House chamber. The House formed a committee to investigate the incident.

Photo by George Kochaniec Jr.@The Rocky

State Rep. Douglas Bruce enters an 8 a.m. news conference today at the Capitol. Bruce outlined upcoming legislation and told reporters he would not discuss Monday's kicking incident of a Rocky Mountain News photographer.

Javier Manzano © The Rocky

Reporters question Colorado Springs Republican Rep. Douglas Bruce at his designated office desk, next to the bathroom on the third floor of the state capitol, after a brief recess from the State Legislature. House Republicans condemned Bruce for kicking a Rocky photographer and promised a tight rein on their new colleague to ensure such an outburst "never happens again."

Javier Manzano / The Rocky

State rookie lawmaker Douglas Bruce bows his head during a prayer in the House on Jan. 14. Moments later, Bruce kicked a Rocky photographer.

House Speaker Andrew Romanoff and House Minority Leader Mike May this morning announced the creation of a special committee to investigate Rep. Doug Bruce's kicking of a Rocky Mountain News photographer on Monday.

Bruce this morning called his swift kick more of a "nudge or a tap" but said the House leaders are "entitled to have any committee about any incident that they want."

Romanoff told reporters that he has reviewed a tape of the incident, spoken with Bruce and conveyed his apology on behalf of the House to Rocky Editor, Publisher and President John Temple.

"This is a very troubling development, and I think it warrants further examination, and I think we're both looking forward to the recommendations of the committee before we proceed," Romanoff said.

Even his own party is refusing to back him.

After noting Bruce's efforts in passing TABOR, Dick Wadhams wrote in his blog, "as the state chairman of Colorado Republicans I must strongly denounce the behavior of State Representative Douglas Bruce. Representative Bruce’s reputation as a fiscal reformer was terribly tarnished by his refusal to be sworn in last week when the Colorado General Assembly opened because he wanted to guarantee he could potentially serve a full four terms. "

Wadhams also said Bruce "was absolutely wrong in literally kicking a Rocky Mountain News photographer on the floor of the House. Representative Bruce does owe that photographer and the entire House of Representatives an apology."

Bruce's actions over the last several days has "severely marginalized his ability" to be "a voice for fiscal discipline" in the legislature, Wadhams added.

Romanoff said the special committee's job will be to determine the facts, interview witnesses, review the tape and make recommendations for actions to the House as a whole, "rather than either ignoring this incident or rushing to judgment on our own."

Romanoff said he thinks the committee can ask for subpoena power, but that he would look into the matter further. The committee will also have to review whether House rules apply to Bruce since he had not yet been sworn in when the incident occurred.

Bruce delivered a swift kick with his right foot to Rocky photographer Javier Manzano's left knee — saying, "Do not do that again" — during the ceremonial morning prayer on the House floor Monday.

The kick knocked Manzano off-balance, causing one of his cameras to tip over on the floor.

Bruce has refused to apologize and called characterizations of him kicking Manzano a "media-sensationalized word," saying it was more of a "nudge or a tap or a prod." He said it was warranted and that Manzano owed Bruce, the House and the public an apology for disrupting the morning prayer by taking photographs.

"I was just trying to get him to stop disrupting the procedures, period," Bruce said. "So I don't regret trying to get him to stop disrupting the proceedings even though I was doing so as a private citizen. If there's anyone who should be charged with violating the order and decorum of the House, it is he."

House rules allow the media full access to the floor where the incident happened. No restrictions are placed on photographers during prayers or other activities.

"I wish he would apologize, but that doesn't affect the committee's doing its responsibilities," May said Tuesday.

May emphasized the committee will be investigating Bruce's behavior exclusively. "We're not here to examine the press," he said.

Romanoff said the special committee represents new territory for the House.

"I've been here for seven years and I don't recall having formed this kind of committee for this kind of purpose before, but we consulted with our staff and legal team to figure out what would be in keeping with the tradition of the House and what's the best way to get all the facts we need to reach an appropriate conclusion," he said.

The committee's co-chairs will be Reps. Paul Weissmann, D-Louisville, and Steve King, R-Grand Junction. The other members are Reps. Judy Solano, D-Brighton, Claire Levy, D-Boulder, Frank McNulty, R-Highlands Ranch, and Ray Rose, R-Montrose.

Romanoff said the committee has until Jan. 25 to make its recommendations to the House, so that the matter can be resolved as quickly as possible. The committee could recommend that Bruce be reprimanded, censured or expelled. A majority vote in the House would be required to reprimand, while a two-thirds vote would be needed to expel.

The committee's first meeting will be at noon Friday at the Capitol and is open to the public.

What they're saying

Quotes from Douglas Bruce's first day at the Statehouse

"(The photographer) needs to learn some manners."

Douglas Bruce, explaining why he kicked Rocky photographer Javier Manzano and then refused to apologize

"I think it's inappropriate to physically assault anyone. That's a regrettable incident for sure, on Mr. Bruce's behalf."

Rep. Al White, R-Hayden

"He is not the ogre that he has been painted to be. He is generous. He is honest. And mostly, he says exactly what he means."

Ralph Shnelvar, Bruce supporter and former libertarian candidate for governor

"What is this, 'Republicans Gone Wild?' It's out of control."

Michael Huttner, executive director of ProgressNowAction, a liberal advocacy group

"He can take the oath or take a hike."

Rep. Jim Kerr, R-Littleton

Flip-flap

A timeline of the Douglas Bruce swearing-in flap.

* 7:55 a.m. - Douglas Bruce pulls his black Cadillac with "MRTABOR" license plates into its new parking space at the Colorado Capitol.

* 8:15 a.m. - House Clerk Marilyn Eddins hands Bruce his parking permit hang tag. "Hang tag? That sounds ominous," Bruce jokes. "I'm feeling a little tight around the neck!" Bruce then assures Eddins that he will sit quietly through the morning session. "I'm not trying to cause any disturbance," he said.

* 8:30 a.m. - Bruce returns to his car to hang a permit on his rearview mirror. "I'm just a warm fuzzy-wuzzy," he tells Rep. Alice Madden, D-Boulder, in the parking lot.

* 8:45 a.m. - Bruce walks up to the GOP bullpen on the second floor, where he has been given a desk next to the bathroom.

"You have to be the bathroom monitor here," teases Rep. Ken Summers, R-Lakewood.

"I thought I was the one who caused people to go to the bathroom," Bruce said.

* 10 a.m. - Surrounded by a dozen reporters and cameramen, Bruce and three friends sit down on the south bench of the House chamber.

* 10:05 a.m. - Bruce is standing for the morning prayer. Rocky and Post photographers are crouched in front of him. They simultaneously take pictures of Bruce praying. "Don't do that again," Bruce says as he kicks Rocky photographer Javier Manzano's left knee with his right foot.

* 11 a.m. - House Republican Caucus votes 21-1 to make Bruce's seat vacant again if he doesn't take the oath by day's end.

* 1:34 p.m. - House Speaker Andrew Romanoff administers oath of office.

* 4 p.m. - House Minority Leader Mike May issues formal apology to Rocky photographer Javier Manzano.

* 6:30 p.m. - As he climbs into his car to drive home, Bruce tells a reporter that Manzano owes him an apology for acting like a paparazzi, and "it's unfortunate that the minority leader didn't talk to me before he found me guilty."

Douglas Bruce through the years

* 1986: Moved to Colorado from California where he was a former deputy district attorney.

* 1992: Authored Taxpayer?s Bill of Rights, or TABOR, the constitutional amendment that bars state and local governments from raising taxes without a vote.

* 1993: Convicted of violating Denver?s building codes as an owner of several properties and given a 28-day suspended jail sentence and fined more than

$2,000. Conviction is later overturned by a federal judge.

* 1995: Spent eight days in the Denver County Jail for contempt of court during a municipal trial that resulted in his conviction for more building code violations.

* 1996: Unsuccessfully challenged Republican incumbent Ray Powers in a Senate primary.

* 2004: Elected as an El Paso County commissioner.

* 2007: Appointed by a vacancy committee to fill the legislative House seat representing northeast Colorado Springs, which had been represented by Bill Cadman.

• January 15, 2008

  4:13 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Brian1973 writes:

  As a resident of his former district - please keep him denver please

• January 15, 2008

  5:21 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  HolierThanThou writes:

  DENVER (Rooters) - Appointed state representative, Douglas Bruce, showed up on the floor without trousers on Tuesday. All eyes turned as he walked to his desk and photographers snapped hundreds of pictures. The representative became hysterical screaming, "What are YOU looking at!"

  He then grabbed a baseball bat and chased photographers while demanding an apology.

  Polls among Republicans indicate that his popularity has skyrocketed into the double digits. Mark Shaggameister and Tom Tancredo both agreed saying, "This man has proven to be presidential material and we support him."

  State police guarding the Capitol were ambivalent. A source who asked to remain anonymous said, "This situation is very confusing for us. The last time we had a guy who came here claiming to be the Emperor of Colorado, we filled him with enough lead to stop a Rhino."

• January 15, 2008

  5:59 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Dianekkdi writes:

  Why hasn't this man been charged with assault yet?

  This man justifies physical violence. It certainly seem to come easy to him, didn't it? Does he abuse his wife? Is he beating his children? Does he harm animals?

  Odd that such a person should be called presidential material by someone...disgusting really.

  A thorough background check on this physical abuser is a must.

  Meanwhile charges should be filed.

• January 15, 2008

  6:06 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  BirdonaWire writes:

  In like a Lion, out like a Lamb. It was good while it lasted, eh Dougy?

• January 15, 2008

  6:16 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Little_Red_Wagon writes:

  AWWWW! Did someone's knickers get all twisted up? Go see Mommy State, she will kiss it all better.

  What a bunch of babies.

  As to Doug Bruce himself, he is very effective as an ombudsman for taxpayers. I don't have to like him in total to appreciate his good work on tax issues over the years.

  I think that he will be a thorn in the side of both parties, but he will accomplish more than most people believe possible. At very least, it should be entertaining. Don't forget to bring lots of popcorn.

• January 15, 2008

  6:18 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Oh_Wise_One writes:

  Where the outrage at the photog taking a picture while Doug was praying? Can't you liberals be tolerant? I think all your whining is funny, that dude wasn't hurt, it was a slap in the form of a wimpy kick. Big deal. Lucky for the photog that Bruce isn't Muslim.

• January 15, 2008

  6:19 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  GrayOwl writes:

  The Legislature has numerous problems with which to deal. Now, this attention-seeking buffoon diverts attention from the real issues. I can see why El Paso County is pleased to have gone. The idea that he has a right to physically assault someone -- and someone on the floor, at that -- simply because the person declined to take orders from him shows his callous disregard for societal norms and common decency. He should be roundly condemned by legislators, and his background should be thoroughly investigated by law enforcement to determine whether the physical abuse is a first-time thing or a pattern. But you know what is likely to happen? The pols will take care of their new pal. After all, they are so busy making laws to harass the rest of us that they scarecely have time to obey any themselves.

• January 15, 2008

  6:21 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  RG2008 writes:

  Rocky Mountain news owes him an apology! When will photographers be held responsible? He said NO that meant no. What is Rocky Mountain News the Paparazzi of the west!
  I’m sick of this attitude that they can do what ever they want but if you retaliate then they get to sue you! And people wonder why their kids don’t listen to them!

  Get use to it Denver, Doug is here to stay!

  RG

• January 15, 2008

  6:51 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  glowrock writes:

  Rocky Mountain News owes HIM an apology? Last time I checked, the State House is a PUBLIC place, and as such, you can have your photograph taken anywhere, at any time. There are tons of photos of people during the pledge of allegiance, in some sort of prayer, etc... He had no right to kick the photographer, and HE'S the one demanding an apology? If I were the Rocky, I would plaster that video of the photographer getting kicked, and I'd encourage the photographer to file charges against that buffoon!

  This isn't a partisan issue, this isn't an issue of politics at all. It's an issue of one man thinking he's above the law, and one man believing his way is the only way. Doug Bruce is a complete disgrace, and needs to go the way of the Dodo bird.

• January 15, 2008

  7:11 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  hoek writes:

  I don't approve of Bruce's actions. Neither are the photographers actions acceptable.
  The house should work on setting some guidelines for photographers and journalists. Too many lack a basic sense of decency and appropriateness.

• January 15, 2008

  7:25 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  ashlandbus writes:

  If you start restricting photographers in a public arena, such as our legislature, you set a nasty precedent. This is the news, and with news comes photos. Accept that fact. If we want our news, we will continue to get photos with it.

• January 15, 2008

  7:25 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  LS writes:

  NO way does RMN nor Manzano owe any sort of an apology to that narcissistic, a-hole. Funny that he chose that particular photographer to assault though there were others also shooting. I am also a professional photographer and with regard to a private area (or church) the photographer would be on questionable ground, but not in the House. No way. And especially, there is never an excuse to kick someone, EVER, unless it is in self-defense of a physical threat. Anyone who bows their head to pray, then turns around and kicks someone definitely has self control issues. Note that there was no comment made by Manzano. Would like to see an assault charge brought from this, if just to show Bruce that he is no more above the law than anyone else. What a loser.

  This is merely the tip of the iceberg beginning to show, that so many of these legislators and holders of public office hold themselves above the people they are SUPPOSED to be serving and representing.

• January 15, 2008

  7:31 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Spencer writes:

  a new record for being an absolute jerk before the prayer is even over

• January 15, 2008

  7:32 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  ripcord writes:

  Holier, you are so funny. Someone, though, is going to think it is real.

• January 15, 2008

  7:52 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  voiceofreason writes:

  Douglas Bruce committed a crime. Assault in the Third Degree 18-3-204 CRS and he should be charged. He needs to be held accountable.

• January 15, 2008

  7:59 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  theguyoverthere writes:

  You know all these people advocating all the tax stuff Doug has done are forgetting the negative side to what he has done. Because the city and state can't raise taxes at a normal progression and because most people vote no to any kind of tax raise the streets are deteriorating. The City of Colorado Springs had to ground the Police Helicopters except a generous donor donated enough money to keep them flying for a while longer. We can't afford to have the police coverage the city needs. You can't have all the nice roads, and emergency services a city out to have if you don't pay taxes. So all you people whining about paying taxes get over yourselves. You can't complain about the roads and city services and complain about taxes being raised. Douglas Bruce is an idiot that needs to be shown his place in society. If he such an honest and great man, that why did he screw over so many people in his rental properties with building code violations? I think the photographer should sue him, since Bruce thinks he should sue the heck out of the city of Colorado Springs. He thinks the city waists budget money, well Dougy, what about all the money the city had to waist fighting your frivolous law suits? By the way I am not saying we should have outragesly high taxes either, there has to be a compromise and so far it has been the Cities and State doing all the compromising.

• January 15, 2008

  8:21 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  BMat writes:

  There is no House rule that prohibits his picture being taken during the Pledge and Prayer.

  So like a typical Republican he creates his own rules in his own mind to justify his own boorish behaviour.

  Mr. Bruce is a complete HORSES ASS !!!

• January 15, 2008

  8:22 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  David_R writes:

  Bruce was definitely in the wrong by resorting to physical violence. His "integrity" level was aptly demonstrated by not only the childish kick, but also by his equally childish defense of his actions.

  I think the so-called "news professional", the modern day version of what used to be call news reporters and photographers are also not beyond criticism in their race for sensationalism and lack of respect for the subjects/victims of their "journalistic" efforts.

  But hey, look at the positive sides of this incident. Bruce gets to add another notch to his desk for being a public flame thrower, a rebel against a perceived overly intrusive cog of the news machine and people's right to a little privacy regardless of position in society.

  The RMN photographer (and colleagues throughout the news industry) get an additional 15 minutes of fame and sympathy. But the BIG winner is the RMN as they now have fluff and fodder to include in their daily ad flier featuring almost sensationalized "important questions about freedom of the press" and growing concerns over the upward bias of violence in our society -- sure beats spending money assembling real news and fills in a lot of that pesky blank space between ads.

• January 15, 2008

  8:27 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  ripcord writes:

  Look at the video. http://www.rockymountainnews.com/vide.... One photog is egging the other photog on supposedly after being told by Bruce not to take his picture during the prayer. Bruce's actions are not justified, but the photogs knew they were doing something that would get a reaction and did it on purpose. Reprimands all around.

• January 15, 2008

  8:33 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  gscott writes:

  First I am not a fan of Bruce either, but I do back him in what he did. Too bad he doesn't exercise so his kick would have been a little higher. The news reporters have the right, or do they, to take pictures, speed to track other people of news. See Dianne story,tragic story for some one just trying to get away from the press. See Britany again publicized in the news as well as her sister now trying to share the same spot light because of the news. Is there not a code or creed that they should follow, this is called repect and manners, obilously not shown by the reporters. I think he should be removed from his job. It is also of note that the article in the paper protecting this scum reporter has me wondering if I want to continue my subscription to a paper that gets its story by these means. The papers job is to report not to take sides nor to influence its readers. I think you are overstepping your boundries

  Thank you,

  G Scott

• January 15, 2008

  8:36 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Diff writes:

  He is a low life, slum lord, self-important, first class jerk!
  Douglas Buruce is an embarrassment to the whole State, how can we proceed to remove him from the State legislature? Then hopefully remove him from the state!

• January 15, 2008

  8:42 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  EastVail writes:

  Assault charge?

• January 15, 2008

  8:50 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  RG2008 writes:

  Hey Bruce was just chasging(kicking) the reporter away from him like any other dog that got to close. Oh, I forgot they have a camera so they are god and can do what ever they want. If the photographer wasn't in his personal space then Bruce couldn't have kicked him.
  If the dog(photographer) thought he had a right to do it then why did he ask? And why he do it after he was told no.

  RG

• January 15, 2008

  9 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Froward69 writes:

  O'l douggie bruce the tax crusader, and slumlord. consistently undermines government at every turn. He has actually done time for violating basic housing rules. he would be immune from prosecution if he had been sworn in BEFORE assaulting a photographer.

  AAH alas no, he delayed taking the oath to circumvent term limits...

  so he is due a summons and more jail time for ASSAULT. as he had NOT taken the oath before expressing his disdain for members of a free press.

  12 months Jail, exclusion from the state house, Anger management courses and Supervised Probation, would be expected. and IS most warranted. but will not curtail his audacious, Immature and flagrant disdain for proper behavior in the future.

  THROW him out of Colorado altogether.

• January 15, 2008

  9:02 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  fntsymtn writes:

  Ah the police state we live in. While it is ridiculous that Bruce would kick a photographer for taking his photo, it's equally ridiculous that we're suggesting charges be filed against Bruce for his actions -- which is probably why no charges will be filed.

  The people in the video appear to be aged enough to be considered "adults" in our society. Handle it like adults and not whining suing school children -- keep it out of our over-worked legal system; there are drug pushers, nuns and illegal aliens to prosecute. The statement has already been made, public opinion is far more important to a politian than some frivolous lawsuit.

  If the photographer was truly trying to get shots "of the moment" why did he put his camera down after he was "assaulted"? Seems to me, a photo of Bruce's expression right after the "kick" would have been quite valuable. The photographers actions were transparently contrived to elicit a reaction from Bruce, nothing more ... he got what he deserved. Where are the photos that were taken being published?

  Bruce is a moron, both for kicking the guy while the video cameras were rolling (should have taught the cameraman manners off camera) and for his antics leading up to the incident.

• January 15, 2008

  9:05 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  johnmcevoyphoto writes:

  Douglas Bruce should be charged with assault for kicking Rocky Photog Manzano. As a lawmaker, Bruce should be familiar with what the law is regarding kicking another person (if he is not defending himself).
  Perhaps a charge of assault would wake him up to the reality of his unacceptable actions and attitude. Bruce is the one that should apologize!
  John McEvoy

• January 15, 2008

  9:07 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Politico writes:

  Media have been on the floor for years without issue and the first day this lunatic is on the floor he causes a disturbance by kicking someone. The photographer was being "disrespectful" Bruce? So you kick him? What a mature way to deal with a problem.

  I am calling him a lunatic as a fellow Republican. Douglas Bruce gives Republlicans a bad name. Did his measures help to control spending? Sure. But better plans, with less drastic consequences, could have been equally effective.

  Douglas Bruce convinced people to vote for his measures by using scare tactics with primarily senior citizens. I am all for controlling spending, but Bruce is not bringing much to the Colorado House of Representatives, other than a radical voice for controlled spending. He brings a disruption that does far more harm than good.

  California was glad to be rid of him. Colorado should be so lucky!

• January 15, 2008

  9:22 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  CWW writes:

  Kicking was not appropriate. He should have done what I do with my puppy---squirt him in the face with water. Maybe that would teach these intrusive newspaper idiots to respect a request not to take pictures.

• January 15, 2008

  9:35 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Retread writes:

  What happened to common respect, if someone asks you to NOT to do something, you respect their wishes. I grow weary of upskirts photos of Britney, shots of Hasselhoff drunk, Prince Charles in his knickers, and what makes them think I want to see pictures of Bruces cohones?

• January 15, 2008

  9:37 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  ramAZ writes:

  Wasn't going to post a comment until I read the idiocy posted by RG above.

  Hey RG, why don't you check into laws on assault and what goes in to being a PUBLIC FIGURE.

  If this a-hole doesn't want his picture snapped, why did he turn the entire day into a circus event?

  He is a public figure and his photo was taken in a venue where the press has the RIGHT to work.

  Stating that the photographer and the publication owe an apology is a simple statement of stupidity.

  The true outrage will be if this photographer does not pursue legal action against that pompous idiot. As a journalist, it is his duty to pursue this illegal act on the floor of the Colorado State Legislature.

  I can not believe this story.

• January 15, 2008

  10:50 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Spencer writes:

  There is nothing more cowardly than some fat out of shape older man kicking or punching someone when they know there will be no retaliation. I wish the photgrapher would have kicked his ass. Bruce's career in the House may end up being shorter than Rush Limbaugh's career at ESPN. He tried to go mainstream and it lasted all of about 2 weeks. They kind of remind me of each other, pompous bags of fat.

• January 15, 2008

  11:01 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  Lowtaxequalsfreedom writes:

  Doug Bruce is always calculating. I have never seen him act in haste. Think about all of the attention Doug has directed to himself and more importantly to voter approved article 10 section 20 of the Colorado Constitution. There is an unprecedented attack on TABOR taking place at the Local and State level. Bureaucrats are going out of their way to twist the intent of TABOR ultimately increasing tax revenue and disregarding the will of the people.

  GO DOUGY GO! The real outrage should be from the people towards the politicians. WHY ARE YOU VIOLATING OUR TABOR? WHY ARE YOU CIRCUMVENTING THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE? WHY DO YOU ALWAYS WANT MORE OF OUR MONEY? WHY IS GOVERNEMNT BECOMING LESS EFECIENT AND NOT MORE EFFECIENT? WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO INDEPENDENCE? WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO LIMITED GOVERNMENT? ARE WE WITNESSING THE DEATH OF FREEDOM? DID 911 SCARE US ALL SO MUCH THAT WE HAVE GIVEN UP OUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS? WE NEED MORE PEOPEL LIKE DOUG BRUCE!

  Doug you have gained more then enough attention. Now please get to the issues and try to keep you hands to your self. Play nice. Do the crime do the time. Popperatzi get a real job.

• January 15, 2008

  11:18 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  anya writes:

  dougie bruce is just a typical Republican barbarian.

• January 15, 2008

  11:42 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  AC writes:

  The photog was completely correct. The rules of the House allow photos. Doug Bruce cannot say "don't take my picture." If he doesn't want his picture taken he should have turned down his statehouse appointment... simple as that. Get used to it. He does not make his own rules, even though he tried all week to do just that.

• January 15, 2008

  11:45 a.m.

  Suggest removal

  cakeckh writes:

  Sounds like Romanoff did his investigation and sent Bruce to the third floor bathroom office. It's about time someone spiced up the State Legislature! Romanoff and his gang of Democrats have been running amuck!

  Bruce kicked the camera and not the guy. I agree with CWW - he should have squited the camera man with a water gun. Ops, I guess you can't bring guns into the legislature anymore! I can't could fathom the pioneers leaving their guns at the door.

• January 15, 2008

  12:02 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  buffsblg writes:

  Got to love the simple (simplistic) logic of Bruce and his supporters: if you do something I disapprove of, I have the right to assault you as I choose. Not exactly mature, more like the behavior I am trying to teach my 3 year old to avoid. If this is the best El Paso county has, they can look forward to 2 years of no representation in the House, as the deserve.

• January 15, 2008

  12:07 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  PajamaPulitzer writes:

  This is very instructive as to why Republicans are in the minority in both State houses. They're cowards. Finally they have a fighter in their midst and not only do they flee, they turn on him. Do democrats ever turn on their own? Heck no. They fight and they stick together while Republicans apologize for living.
  We need to elect Republicans who have a spine and dump these Lilly-livered cowards.

• January 15, 2008

  12:21 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  theguyoverthere writes:

  For all you Doug Bruce supporters I say wake up and smell the coffee. The only agenda Doug Bruce has is to himself and what would be better for him. He doesn't care about anyone but himself. You honestly live in a bubble if you think he is out there to help you. If he was out there for the people he would have shown up at the beginning of the year when asked. If he was there for the people he would have taken the oath when he originally was supposed to instead of whining about it and trying to get undeserved preferential treatment. If he was there for the people he wouldn't be playing childish games to get attention like kicking a reporter. He is only there for himself, he doesn't do what is in the best interest of the people. Do you think he is trying to get tax breaks for the people? Get a life, he wants tax breaks so he doesn't have to pay so much in taxes on all the property he owns.

• January 15, 2008

  12:28 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  Dan2 writes:

  It is up to the photographer to file charges. If the photographer does file those charges, a proceeding will take place in which the photographer will have to describe what occurred.

  I don't know Mr. Bruce, nor his politics or policies, other than what has been written about in the paper. I do NOT believe that the legislature should take any time at all to form a committee to look into the actions of Mr. Bruce. THAT is a waste of taxpayers money. If the photographer would like to press charges, let the police and legal system work it out. IF Mr. Bruce is convicted of a crime, take a vote of censure, or whatever, but Mr. Bruce is and should be held responsible by the people of the district in which he represents.

  Let the police do their jobs, the legal system do it's job, and the legislature needs to do it's OWN job, not this nonsense.

• January 15, 2008

  12:31 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  benn writes:

  I heard John Temple this morning stating that of course the Rocky nor the photog would file charges. He said they would let the house decide punishment, if any.

• January 15, 2008

  12:38 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  conniesz writes:

  I WANT photographers in my state capitol taking pictures of our legislators in action - the capitol is a public place full of public persons with absolutely zero expectation of privacy. If Bruce doesn't like those rules he should have declined the appointment. He should be charged with assault because that's exactly what he did - assault someone. Don't we tell children to learn to control their anger - that there is never an acceptable reason for throwing the first punch?

  Maybe Bruce should be sent back to kindergarten to learn how to behave in public. I don't care if he asked that his picture not be taken - he can ask but no one is bound by his desires when he is in a public place, no one does. It's part of living in the US of A - If you are news, and someone takes your picture, there's nothing you can do about it... NOTHING! It is our right to photograph public persons in public - you don't have to like it, but that's the way it is. Perhaps he should not appear in public if he doesn't want his photo taken.

  Charge the idiot with assault and be done with him.

• January 15, 2008

  12:40 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  newsguy writes:

  Who would Jesus kick?

• January 15, 2008

  12:52 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  Frank25 writes:

  House has been in session since 9 January, and nothing happened until Douglas Bruce showed up on Monday. Surely there are more important things happening in the world that should have received attention from both papers and television stations. Why do I get the idea the media vultures were there to ensure there would be a story. I feel for those who found chance to blame President Bush, Republicans, Conservatives, and obviously there had to be some Democratic help. Oh for the days, when Douglas could have taken that photographer or some of other side of the House out in the street and applied the gloves, or a buggy whip. Already 5 days of 90 passed, and nothing done, not even bandaids on our state problems. Woe is me!!!!!!!!!!!! Even Mike Littwin chimed in, and was not even present, but said he was home in bed. Really???

• January 15, 2008

  1:01 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  Diff writes:

  There is clear evidence that Bruce committed assault, enough evidence he should be CHARGED (it's up to the police not the RMN or the Photog) tryed and if found Guilty - Sentenced! plain and simple.
  The legislature should also in some way sensure him for his acts and for commiting a crime, and if he should behave in a like manor again, he should be removed from Office!
  Of course I think the people of Elpaso county could mount a recall effort, I would be seeking to organize that effort if I lived there.

• January 15, 2008

  1:30 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  jmfslots writes:

  I cannot understand some comments, from Bigfoot Bruce's supporters, that feel he did no wrong and the photographer was wrong. The photographer was doing his job in a legal manner. Taking pictures such as this is legal and has been done for years. Assaulting someone because you disagree with them is against the law. Douglas Bruce broke the law. The Representatives are suppose to create laws that protect the public- not break laws as they see fit. A cloud has been placed over the entire House of Representatives due to Douglas Bruce's action.
  One day in the House and already he is turning it into a circus.

• January 15, 2008

  2:25 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  westforkforge writes:

  To GScott-
  Sadly you don't know the difference between a college educated photojournalist and a common paparazzi and therefore have revealed your ignorance. You and others like you do a insult a group of hard working professionals by lumping anyone carrying a camera together. The college educated photojournalists, such as the ones employed by the Rocky and other newspapers across our nation are held to a code of ethics whereas a paparazzi has none. The quality of the photographs produced by the Rocky professionals are taken to compliment the articles for the benefit of the reading public. They are works of art in their composition as well as informative in completing a story. The Denver reading public is fortunate to have such a fine, talented staff. The vile disrespect reflected by your comments comes from either your lack of understanding the difference between a professional and a common paparazzi or pure ignorance on your part.

• January 15, 2008

  2:28 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  CDee writes:

  I will agree that he did not have a right to touch the photographer in any way, but if I had made that much noise as a kid during prayer at church I would have gotten far worse from my grandmother than a "stop it" foot to the knee.

• January 15, 2008

  2:47 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  benn writes:

  Yea, well, this wasn't Church CDee

• January 15, 2008

  3:52 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  ripcord writes:

  This has got to be a conspiracy by Geo Bush. We should have a federal congressional investigation by the House Democrats.

• January 15, 2008

  4:08 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  Diff writes:

  He keeps trying to "expalin it" away, making justifications for his own bad acts, and say it's all 'their' and fault and everyone else involved owes him an apology, etc etc etc; all classic addictive behaviors, I think he should be drug tested!

• January 15, 2008

  4:09 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  davies writes:

  Did you hear about the photographer orbiting the earth? Chuck Norris didn't want his picture taken.

• January 15, 2008

  4:13 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  dirkle writes:

  Bruce is and has consistently been a menace and a clown.
  He needs to be removed immediately.

  As for the fools who keep returning him to the legislature:

  Have they no shame?

• January 15, 2008

  4:27 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  SpringsGal writes:

  Mr. Bruce claims he acted because the photographer was being disruptive and disrepectful during a prayer.

  Please tell me this, Mr Bruce--which is more disruptive and disrepectful: A photographer sitting on the floor snapping a few pictures or a grown man speaking through clenched his teeth and without warning, kicking a man who is kneeling on the floor--during that same prayer?

  As a Colorado Springs resident and a Republican, I've watched over the years as he's continually disrupted proceedings and bullied fellow decision-makers until he gets his way. His frivolous lawsuits against the city for silly reasons cost taxpayer money, even as he continually claims to be the Taxpayer's Saviour.

  Mr. Bruce may very well be a man who will hold our legislators to a higher level of accountability. But if his childish antics and combative personality get in the way of making good progress in moving our state government forward, then Mr. Bruce needs to go back home and clean up his properties.

• January 15, 2008

  4:31 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  junglegymco writes:

  This is IN THE CHAMBER OF OUR LEGISTLATURE - A POLITICAL BODY!!! If freedom of press is allowed ANYWHERE, it's HERE!!!

  I'm not sure what is more abhorrent - the literal and figurative assault on the freedom of the press, the refusal of Bruce to apologize, or that some "Americans" would actually defend Bruce's disgustingly un-American behavior.

  Bruce's New Amendment: F.A.S.C.I.S.T. (Fickle Activist Screams Childish Inane Stupidities Today)

• January 15, 2008

  4:32 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  davies writes:

  "As for the fools who keep returning him to the legislature: Have they no shame?"

  It was the first day of his first term. Any shame in not knowing the facts before you wag a finger?

• January 15, 2008

  4:43 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  lhayes79 writes:

  Why is it disrespectful to take a picture of someone praying? If you're faithful and are praying in public, why would you be upset with a news photographer capturing your image doing something that's obviously important to you? By reprimanding the photographer and kicking him mid-prayer, seems like that's even more of a distraction than getting your photo taken -- and certainly not projecting the image of Christian fellowship on your first day in office. If that's all it takes to set off this Bruce guy, look out Colorado!

  And from the report I read, Bruce didn't ask the photographer to stop and then kick him after the photog refused. Maybe I didn't catch all the deets, but sounds like he kicked and objected simultaneously. At least give the guy a chance to stop before you knock him over!

  A better way to handle it would've been let it go and talk to the photog afterward, asking him not to photograph you praying in the future because you find it offensive. The photog may decline to follow your wishes -- it is a public space, after all -- but at least you both know where you stand. Bruce is a public official -- he needs learn to think before he acts. Image is everything, and his isn't great right now.

• January 15, 2008

  4:47 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  breasor writes:

  Maybe the photographer shouldn't been taking a picture right in Bruce's face as he was praying. Maybe the standard should be, if you have to take a picture at that time and out of respect to that personal private moment of worship, you should take the picture from at least 10 feet away.

  I have a feeling if this had been person of another religion (muslim, etc.), the photographer would have thought of doing this or at least been more respectful.

• January 15, 2008

  4:52 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  observe writes:

  To those who think Bruce was right in his actions:

  1. If you are about to walk in front of me, and I ask you to NOT walk in front of me, is it ok for me to kick you if you indeed ignore my request?

  2. Is kicking a reasonable response to a disagreement?

  3. Would you agree that anyone who wants to be a member of the State Legislature should actually hold themself to a higher standard of decorum and behavior than the "common citizen?"

• January 15, 2008

  4:57 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  Dan2 writes:

  Diff,

  For assault to occur, there has to be a complaint filed by a victim, unless observed directly by law enforcement. If the photographer does not file a complaint, then the likelihood of the district attorney to present charges to a grand jury is unlikely.

  dirkle,

  Unless you are a constituent of Mr. Bruce, I don't think it is any of your business who they choose to represent them. Are you attempting to be judge and jury in the most ignorant of extremes? The right of the people to elect their representative lies solely with those that inhabit that district. As far as your ignorance to "returning him," he is a first term representative to the Colorado Legislature. How do you "return" someone on the first day?

  Maybe instead of rushing to judgment you should take some time to examine the topic at hand and do a little research before your fingers get you into trouble?

• January 15, 2008

  4:59 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  bjjdenver writes:

  Damn. Lets make a big deal out of nothing. Have him apologize and then get over it. Nobody was injured and they don't need to waste any more time and tax money investigating this. Very typical of our society...my personal space was violated, he kicked me, I was called a name, blah, blah, blah. We need to quit being so damn sensitive and get over ourselves. You can't even look at anyone today without a confrontation or the inevitable lawsuit.

  Special committee being formed...lolololololololololololol!!!!!!!

  Way to go!

• January 15, 2008

  5:12 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  justal writes:

  The waste of tax money here is that Representative Bruce actually gets paid with TAXPAYER money. Bruce can start saving the people of Colorado money by refusing his own salary.

  Can we start a ballot initiative to remove this guy from office? Throw Bruce Out as a Representative -- we'll call it T-BOR!

• January 15, 2008

  5:17 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  rg writes:

  It appears that 99% of the comments seek retribution with Jesus Christ appearing to tell him he is a hypocrite for praying in public when he should do his praying in his closet. Maybe the legislature will take note and dispense with public prayer accepting that "Nothing fails like prayer." Richard Grimes, Deicide: http://www.geocities.com/r22037/think...

• January 15, 2008

  5:23 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  jay045 writes:

  I predict that Douglas Bruce will be the Britney Spears of Colorado politics.

• January 15, 2008

  5:32 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  ISKIFREELY writes:

  Can someone please get Doug Bruce some new ties? Poor guy looks like a shoe salesman.

• January 15, 2008

  5:33 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  ZitherHither writes:

  Bruce seems like a big jerk. He didn't want to take his oath of office when he was supposed to because it was not to HIS advantage to do so.

  Then...he stomps on a photographer's knee for taking his picture while praying in a public place?! That photographer was a working man doing his job!! Hope the photographer has him arrested for assault. I would in a nanosecond. Has Bruce apologized to the photographer yet?

  It appears Mr. Bruce wants to do things that only suit Mr. Bruce and if things don't go his way, he'll use violence then hide behind the skirts of religion like a little girl. That's not very Christ-like I don't care who you are.

  Republicans should have kicked him out to start with over the oath thing. Now they've got a self-serving bully on their hands, my advice is - watch your back, ladies and gentlemen of the House.

• January 15, 2008

  5:36 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  gs writes:

  My predictions for 2008; North Korea will lie about everything, Haiti will be in chaos, and Rep Bruce will piss off so many people that Colorado Springs will be asked to secede from the Union.

• January 15, 2008

  6:24 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  buffsblg writes:

  Just a note folks, no one elected Bruce to this seat, it was a gift to him from the El Paso county republicans (or perhaps their way of getting him out of town). He is replacing another legislator mid term. Voters have every right to elect any moron they wish. If the voters of that district choose they can return him to office. They should just understand that he will accomplish nothing but getting publicity for himself.

• January 15, 2008

  6:34 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  Jim writes:

  For all you do Doug this song's for you.

  http://youtube.com/watch?v=3i6OrOZwtmA

• January 15, 2008

  7:03 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  ezekiel777 writes:

  My life as a conservative ended with the phrase "Si, se puede!". It finally dawned on me that conservatives did not stand for liberty, freedom, the free market spirit or the rise of entrepreneaurs.... Their reaction to the immigrants' walkout in May 2 years ago was to kick people who only want to work hard, make better lives for their families and live the American dream... As it turns out their reaction merely revealed the ugly side of the conservative philosophy...racism. Doug Bruce...Tom Tancrado...Rush Limbaugh.... every conservative voice out there is all for freedom...so long as it's for their own kind.

  Laws that aren't enforced are not laws. I say let in the immigrants... and kick out the conservatives....Bruce is just another example of an arrogant, self-absorbed conservative who is out of touch with the public, couldn't govern if given the chance and needs to go. We don't need these type of people running things.

  I will never vote for a conservative again.

• January 15, 2008

  8:01 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  GrayOwl writes:

  Let's see now. The Good Mr. Bruce objects to being photographed while he is praying so he kicks a fellow human being, and one who is on the floor at that. To what God is he praying -- himself? His excuse for his assault is weak and dishonest at best and self-indicting in reality.

• January 15, 2008

  8:54 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  titancain writes:

  Next time my employer takes a photo of me, I'll kick him. I'm eating! Thanks repubs.

• January 15, 2008

  9:40 p.m.

  Suggest removal

  GH writes:

  Bruce, means well he's just use to working at a formica kitchen table with his mother. He'll get use to crowds and photo journalists sticking a camera at him. Give him a break, this is first day on this job. Only time will show us what a great American he truly is.