Go to the mobile version of this Web site.

Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Paid archives | Alerts | Electronic edition | Advertise | Subscribe to the paper | Today's Extras

Breaking News:

Subscribe

Bill Clinton comment may offend Obama camp

Sam Youngman, The Hill

Published August 26, 2008 at 1:47 p.m.
Updated August 26, 2008 at 1:47 p.m.

Text size  

Bill Clinton appeared to undermine Sen. Barack Obama again Tuesday.

The former president, speaking in Denver, posed a hypothetical question in which he seemed to suggest that that the Democratic Party was making a mistake in choosing Obama as its presidential nominee.

He said: "Suppose you're a voter, and you've got candidate X and candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything, but you don't think that candidate can deliver on anything at all. Candidate Y you agree with on about half the issues, but he can deliver. Which candidate are you going to vote for?"

Then, perhaps mindful of how his off-the-cuff remarks might be taken, Clinton added after a pause: "This has nothing to do with what's going on now."

The comments are unlikely to be taken as an innocent mistake by those Democrats who continue to be angry with the former president for, they say, not supporting the Illinois senator wholeheartedly, if not implicitly undercutting him.

The controversial comments came just hours before Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), the former first lady and principal rival to Obama, was due to speak from the convention podium.

Democrats concerned about what the former president might say when he addresses the Democratic convention Wednesday night would likely have cringed at his remarks Tuesday to a group of foreign dignitaries.

The former president talked about the importance of a politician being able to deliver on his promises following an electoral victory and how voters factor in that ability to deliver when picking their candidate.

During the contentious and at times nasty nomination battle between Clinton and Obama, the Clinton campaign repeatedly pushed the question of whether Obama, a freshman senator, had the experience or the ability to deliver on his promises if elected. Clinton, they argued, was more suited to do so.

The former president devoted much of his sometimes-rambling remarks to solving the global energy crisis and the need to address climate change.

But time and again he returned to his great love of politics, noting that it was more than the closeness and intensity of the nomination battle between his wife and Obama that piqued his interest this year, but the "infusion of cash from small amounts by Internet donors and the explosion of blog sites."

"For those of us interested in politics, it was an endlessly fascinating process already, and it's still got some twists and turns between now and November," Clinton said.

The former president did say early in his remarks that the purpose of a party convention is to "introduce the candidate in a new and different and hopefully more positive way... [to] unify the party and [aid in] defining the battle" between the two parties.

The unifying-the-party aspect is what has many Democrats concerned about Clinton's Wednesday night remarks.

Clinton has been a media magnet throughout the year as his remarks have caused heartache and headaches to former and current supporters.

From when he called Obama's candidacy "a fairytale" to when he compared the Illinois senator's win in South Carolina to that of Rev. Jesse Jackson's, many Clinton loyalists, detractors and analysts feel that Clinton did irreparable damage to both his wife's candidacy and his legacy as president.

Now in a convention that continues to be racked with stories and questions about how unified the Democratic Party truly is, Clinton's appearance Wednesday — and his tendency to go off the teleprompter — has some Democrats very nervous.

Former Clinton aide and Democratic strategist Paul Begala, however, told The Hill that the former president is solidly behind Obama's candidacy.

"He's totally for Barack," Begala said Tuesday. "He's totally for Barack."

Comments

  • August 26, 2008

    3:43 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    Thewiseman writes:

    Frisky Bill has no room to talk. He needs to learn when to keep his trap shut. I can see the next ad by McSame; This will be in the ad. He lost his credibility when he said I didn't have sex with that woman! Need I say anymore. Send him out of the state on a rail like we did in 1908.

  • August 26, 2008

    4:07 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    Mayor_Quimby writes:

    I have more and more respect for Billy everyday.

  • August 26, 2008

    4:08 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    sweetie writes:

    I love Bill Clinton,Obama can go back to Chicago with his FRIENDS.

  • August 26, 2008

    4:15 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    sweetie writes:

    Obama's Friends

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTN3mS...

  • August 26, 2008

    4:34 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    AndyB588 writes:

    I used to love Bill, but I'm really getting sick of him. He is now part of the political system he used to be against.

    Experience is good, but ultimately what intelligence is the key. A good leader knows what they don't know, and they are able to surround themselves with people who are even smarter than them. People who understand the problems and have the experience to get the job done.

    McCain was smart enough to know that he needed to marry into money if he was going to be successful. But the guy is not smart enough to be able to surround himself with brilliant people.. and even if he can bring in advisors that are smarter than him.. well that’s not saying much.

    McCain isn’t even bringing anything new to the table, he’s just doing politics as usual,, as long as you can lie, twist and distort your opponents message to ensure the population think’s he’s just as big of a loser as you are then you don’t need a message. You just need to hope that your base will show up on Election Day and everyone else will be so disillusioned with these dirty politicians they just stay home.

  • August 26, 2008

    4:40 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    wendy writes:

    I wouldn't be surprised if Bill Clinton, with his big mouth, is the main reason Hillary wasn't Obama's choice for VP.

  • August 26, 2008

    5:09 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    mlbdenver writes:

    I wouldn't be surprised if Bill Clinton, with his big mouth, is the main reason Hillary is not the Dem's choice for President.

Post your comment

Registration is required. Click here to create your free user account, or login below.

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.




(Forgotten your password?)




News Tip

Know about something we should be reporting? Tell us about it.

Sponsored links



Reprints