Go to the mobile version of this Web site.

Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Paid archives | Electronic edition | Subscription Questions | Extras

Home › News › Local News

Campgrounds closed/delayed by beetle-ravaged pines

By Todd Hartman, Rocky Mountain News

Published April 10, 2008 at 5:25 p.m.
Updated April 10, 2008 at 6:01 p.m.

Text size  
Around Dillion Lake many trees that are dead or have been dying due to the pine beetle infestation have been cleared.

Photo by Linda McConnell/Special to the Rocky

Around Dillion Lake many trees that are dead or have been dying due to the pine beetle infestation have been cleared.

Becky and Sam Sherstad of Frisco take a walk down the the Old Dillion Reservoir trail, which is surrounded by trees dying from the pine beetle infestation near Frisco on Wednesday.

Photo by Linda McConnell/Special to the Rocky

Becky and Sam Sherstad of Frisco take a walk down the the Old Dillion Reservoir trail, which is surrounded by trees dying from the pine beetle infestation near Frisco on Wednesday.

Related Links

More Local News

More stories »

Colorado's pine beetle epidemic will put a crimp in camping this year, as national forests and parks are forced to delay the opening of numerous sites — or close them altogether — to remove thousands of dead trees.

The beetle-clobbered trees pose a safety problem, as the weakened lodgepole and other pine are more susceptible to falling over onto unsuspecting campers, hikers, picnickers or even those asleep in their tents.

"That's our number one concern for people," said Mary Ann Chambers, a bark beetle specialist with the U.S. Forest Service, noting that more trees are likely to fall with the passage of time. "The beetle-killed trees are at an age now where they're a bigger hazard."

The state's latest pine beetle infestation, building since the late 1990s, has grown to 1.5 million acres of mostly lodgepole forest, reaching a point foresters have labeled "catastrophic." While most intense on the Western Slope, it is spreading deeply into the Front Range.

This week, the White River National Forest and Rocky Mountain National Park announced specific beetle-related campground closures. But more areas are likely to issue specific closure lists in the coming weeks, as experts are able to assess beetle-invaded campgrounds, Chambers said.

Rangers in the White River National Forest announced six of 57 campgrounds would likely have delayed openings and three — Prospector, Lowry and Blue River in the Dillon Ranger District — would be closed this year "due to the vast extent of the beetle infestation," the Forest Service said in a statement.

Rocky Mountain National Park announced the closure of the 98-site Timber Creek Campground on the park's west side until early July. Campgrounds on the park's east side will likely have partial closures, and backcountry sites used by backpackers will be closed for short periods as well this summer, said park spokeswoman Kyle Patterson.

Some campgrounds have already had hazardous trees removed, including the popular Heaton Bay site in the Dillon area. Crews are already at work at several camp sites, despite deep snow cover, so campgrounds will be ready for the late spring and summer.

Campers will need to be prepared to see treeless campgrounds, however.

"Yes, there will probably be some campgrounds that don't have tree cover — that's part of the challenge with the (beetle)," Chambers said. She said realtors in Summit County have already found a way to put the treeless areas in a positive light, declaring such places feature "emerging vistas."

Despite work to remove the trees, officials are reminding the public to be careful and not presume all hazardous trees have been cut down. The beetle problem continues, they warn, and caution visitors to be aware of dead trees and wind conditions.

A shortage of contractors means it will take time to get to all the risky trees.

"Everybody and their brother is working on these bark beetle projects," Chambers said. "You can only do so much in a season with the number of contractors we have in Colorado, and there's a lot of work."

Comments

  • April 10, 2008

    8:57 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    mani writes:

    Let's see, we can spend money to open and staff the campground or we can close it and sell the trees to highest bidder. Since we won't be opening the Campground we won't need as many Parks employees. Well Of course "Safety" is the reason.