The senators' chance
Allard, Salazar should just say no to Piñon Canyon expansion
Published July 13, 2007 at midnight
In the next few weeks, the Army's plans to nearly triple the size of its training facility at Piñon Canyon in southeastern Colorado will face a key legislative test. And we hope that by then, Sens. Wayne Allard and Ken Salazar will reject the proposal.
The test will come in the form of a military construction bill that will be before the Senate. In the House version, an amendment was added by 3rd District Rep. John Salazar and 4th District Rep. Marilyn Musgrave that would deny the Army any funding to proceed on the project in the next fiscal year. That includes money to conduct scheduled environmental reviews on the targeted area.
If the final version of the construction bill does not include the Salazar- Musgrave amendment, the Army will be able to move forward. Yet so far, neither Colorado senator has shown any interest in championing the House amendment.
To this point, Allard and Ken Salazar have not come out for or against the plan. They've mainly said that they a) oppose the use of eminent domain to acquire land for the 414,000-acre addition and b) insist that the expansion be a "winner" for the region's economy.
Salazar has also asked for some assurances that ranchers could continue to graze in areas of the expansion plan, though we're not sure how that would work in a range that will allow live fire.
For his part, Allard says environmental studies could conclude that the project is not acceptable, which could convince the Army to abandon it. We don't put much stock in that possibility; environmental concerns didn't derail the original maneuver site, and Army officials have been quite clear that the expansion is a priority.
Local opponents of the expansion worry that the senators' conditions may amount to a tacit endorsement of the Army's plans, and that the senators are looking for excuses that will allow the project to advance.
We hope that's not true. If the senators mean what they say about eminent domain, for example, it's difficult to imagine how the Army could comply. How could it occupy an area more than four times the size of the city of Denver without condemning private property, when many farmers and ranchers in the affected region have already vowed they'll never willingly sell?
Allard notes that the expansion will occur in stages, which would allow willing sellers (if there are any) to come forward. That's still no bargain for those who don't want to sell. Once the Army gets the green light to actively acquire land, the entire project will become inevitable. Owners would then be foolish to invest in maintaining or improving their property and might feel obliged to dump their land for whatever the market would bear - which might not be much.
The Army told Allard this week that the project would deliver nearly half a billion dollars in construction spending and then about 8,000 new jobs after it's completed. That may be right. But residents have made clear they would rather forgo those economic benefits to maintain their way of life and the character of the region.
Gov. Bill Ritter has signed a bill stating that Colorado opposes any such project that seizes private land. The senators should follow his lead, and the wishes of the local constituents, by formally announcing their opposition to the expansion.
Featured
-
2008 Voter’s Guide
Use our Ballot Builder tool to compare your viewpoints to the candidates.
-
A Dozen on Denver
Sandra Dallas wrote 'Lennie's tavern' for our ongoing fiction series. Check it out!
-
Rocky Multimedia
The news comes alive in our videos and slide shows. Catch up on today's events.
-
Bronco Dean's rant
Listen to Bronco Dean's totally biased pregame rant about the Broncos-Jaguars game.
-
Presidential Elections
See how Colorado counties have voted through the years.
-
County election profiles
A look at how residents in each Colorado county may vote.
-
A dream fulfilled
A Rocky Mountain News and MediaStorm production
-
Latest from Dove Valley
Click for more broncos videos.
-
Sam Adams' Open Mic
No. 44 means a lot to Floyd Little




Post your comment
Registration is required. Click here to create your free user account, or login below.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.