What Ritter said - and meant
No softie on crime
Published August 26, 2006 at midnight
Locating Bill Ritter's pre-campaign views on some issues can be as difficult as finding a buried chest on an isle of sand. The Democratic nominee for governor spent his professional career as Denver district attorney and was rarely quoted on economic policy, regulation, the environment or numerous other matters.
But of course Ritter was interviewed regularly on crime and punishment. There is not a great deal of mystery on his attitude toward law enforcement or criminal justice issues - or at least there shouldn't be.
Hence our surprise to read the following paragraph in a press release from the campaign of Bob Beauprez, Ritter's Republican opponent: " 'A guy's got to work at getting jail time in Denver. He's got to do something very bad, or keep doing something fairly bad over and over again,' said Bill Ritter, as reported in the Rocky Mountain News, May 3, 1998." The obvious point: Ritter's soft on crime.
To begin with, those are not Ritter's exact words. They are the gist of what Ritter told this paper's editorial page editor - a paraphrase, in other words. Nor do they appear within quotation marks in the column from which they were taken.
But secondly, and far more importantly, Ritter had made the point not as a boast but as a complaint. The DA was irritated with the report of two consultants who claimed that overcrowding in the Denver jail could be alleviated by releasing apparently harmless traffic and drug offenders - and he was doubly irritated with an editorial that praised the conclusion.
What harmless offenders, Ritter had demanded to know. Virtually everyone in the jail is a serial troublemaker, he said, and if someone won't stop breaking the law - even minor laws - it's the DA's job to crack down. "We do alternatives (to jail)," Ritter had said. "But there comes a time when an alternative just isn't right, when 'punishment' shouldn't be sitting at home watching TV and drinking beer."
Meanwhile, Ritter ridiculed the consultants' complaint that the jail population was surging at a time of decreasing crime. Of course it is, Ritter said, because the two are related. In fact, he added, there are people who should be in jail but who aren't because judges are reluctant to exacerbate overcrowding.
In short, the Beauprez campaign lifted a Ritter assertion - not a quotation - in which he was taking a hard line against criminals and twisted it to make him sound like a crime-indulging wimp. The Trailhead Group, an independent outfit supporting Republicans, did the same thing in an earlier press release.
We can understand the frustration among Republicans trying to build a case against Ritter given the maddeningly narrow focus of his public comments over the years. But that's no excuse for the altogether sleazy misuse of what the candidate actually has said.
Featured
-
2008 Voter’s Guide
Use our Ballot Builder tool to compare your viewpoints to the candidates.
-
A Dozen on Denver
Manuel Ramos' story is featured this week on 'A Dozen on Denver.' Check it out!
-
Rocky Multimedia
The news comes alive in our videos and slide shows. Catch up on today's events.
-
Bronco Dean's rant
Listen to Bronco Dean's totally biased pregame rant about the Broncos-Jaguars game.
-
Presidential Elections
See how Colorado counties have voted through the years.
-
County election profiles
A look at how residents in each Colorado county may vote.
-
A dream fulfilled
A Rocky Mountain News and MediaStorm production
-
Latest from Dove Valley
Click for more broncos videos.
-
Sam Adams' Open Mic
No. 44 means a lot to Floyd Little




Post your comment
Registration is required. Click here to create your free user account, or login below.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.